Terry Brown's piece "Are We Too Dependent on Technology?" for ITChronicles on March 31, 2020, closely examines the way society's increasing dependence on technology is not only creating advantages but also disadvantages. Although technology surely makes life easier, Brown cautions that too much reliance may deteriorate cognitive functions, memory, and even vocational expertise in areas such as business and medicine. He offers examples that ring true, such as individuals employing calculators to perform basic math so frequently that they forget how to calculate in their heads. He also refers to scientific research that indicates that technology has the ability to rewire the brain. For example, a study at University College London discovered that using GPS to navigate can inactivate areas of the brain associated with spatial memory. Also pointed out by Brown are issues raised by memory specialist Jim Kwik, who feels that excessive use of digital devices makes it more difficult for individuals to retain and remember information. In medicine, Brown speaks about robotic surgical procedures being beneficial but ultimately leading surgeons to lose their fine motor skills. Regardless of these issues, Brown acknowledges that technology is the backbone of contemporary life. Rather than throwing it out, he advocates creating a balanced way—applying technology responsibly and yet not compromising our critical faculties and practical expertise.

              After reading Brown's article, I agree that technology overreliance has unexpected consequences, particularly on the mind and the acquisition of skills. The article is insightful in its manner because it employs practical illustrations that appeal to most people. For example, advancements in AI assistants have allowed individuals to acquire information instantaneously, yet the ease can render individuals poor at recalling facts or thinking critically. Brown's case is also convincing because he supports his arguments with scientific research, for example, University College London's study on the use of GPS and brain activity. Further, the inclusion of Jim Kwik's opinions regarding memory outsourcing lends credence to the conversation regarding information storage. The explanation of AI-driven robotic-assisted surgeries was especially engaging since it raises essential ethical questions regarding technology's intervention in highly technical professions. Brown explains his point in a logical and unbiased way, neither rejecting the advantages of technology nor ignoring its drawbacks, making the article informative and balanced. As a whole, the article successfully points out the necessity of responsible technology use, reminding readers that although technological progress—especially with AI automation—is beneficial, it's also essential to maintain human intellectual and practical skills.